-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I was thinking more along the lines of the fact I can whip up
a kernel config file with vi; start with some GENERIC and LINT
files, and let us at 'em. I don't object to menuconfig; I'd
just like a bsdconfig. It wouldn't be that much harder to output
a file along the lines of the bsd style than the current
CONFIG_XXX=blah crap is it? So I use menuconfig to get close to
what I want, then use vi and go in and tweak to my hearts content.
--sig--
It isn't true unless it makes you laugh, but you don't
really understand it till it makes you cry.
On Sat, 27 May 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> The BSD setup is not end user friendly. There is actually only one fundamental
> end user problem with our current setup. When a user says 'I want XYZ' it
> should turn on everything needed to get XYZ.
>
> If I hit my capture card option it should turn on i2c, video4linux,procfs, etc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOS/AXsK9HT/YfGeBAQH1SwP/eAMsqLW9QUGrnumgqSvrLnvoWe4bQ+Kr
IT7SYZcgIvK7SbMLCDA90hYIEQUYy+pcwXSLPNoD/eIgFLn45aMMeYGLT1WchP1r
HHXYtXIpnTToVl9IOh9jIVPaBsJBcxM1Pps6psuNXAUSEOQOi5KvDIMUQXx4KcON
4kdGWxDM1Nc=
=KxfO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:17 EST