Re: epic100 && >=2.3.99pre7 && ping -f == reproducible lockup

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Sat May 27 2000 - 19:56:10 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 5 year old bug in main.c (initrd). Can this please be fixed?"
Previous message: Stuart Lynne: "Re: [PATCH] 5 year old bug in main.c (initrd). Can this please be fixed?"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: epic100 && >=2.3.99pre7 && ping -f == reproducible lockup"
Next in thread: dart@iowaone.net: "Re: epic100 && >=2.3.99pre7 && ping -f == reproducible lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Methinks that should be 'TX_RING_SIZE - 2'
>
> Good spotting, I'm not sure it should be 'TX_RING_SIZE -2' but it sure
> looks like a bug. Donald, can you confirm? This is also in your latest
> epic100.c...

It was, effectively, 'TX_RING_SIZE - 2' in earlier versions. I'd expect this to fix dart@iowaone.net's problems, but it would be nice to get this sorted promptly: this
problem also exists in latest 2.2 which is about to be released to manufacturing...

-- -akpm-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 5 year old bug in main.c (initrd). Can this please be fixed?"
Previous message: Stuart Lynne: "Re: [PATCH] 5 year old bug in main.c (initrd). Can this please be fixed?"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: epic100 && >=2.3.99pre7 && ping -f == reproducible lockup"
Next in thread: dart@iowaone.net: "Re: epic100 && >=2.3.99pre7 && ping -f == reproducible lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:18 EST