On Mon, 29 May 2000, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, May 27 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > Jens you asked if I was right about the flags........
> >
> > BOOM we have a test point.........
> >
> > > >>EIP; c013c53c <blkdev_open+8c/110> <=====
> > > Trace; c01336fa <dentry_open+aa/130>
> > > Trace; d48c4040 <[ide-mod]__kstrtab_ide_spin_wait_hwgroup+0/0>
> > > Trace; c0133669 <dentry_open+19/130>
> >
> > Now it is easy to undo the change to preserve the lock.....
> > But why do we need it......is the real question...
>
> This trace looks odd to me. Did the trap in ide_spin_wait_hwgroup I
> told you to add ever trigger? The new code still looks 100% alright
> to me.
You are right that it is funny......and I agree that the new code is
fundimentailly correct, I gunning at anything and everything to chase with
only two-weeks til the boss is back from Finland.....
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:23 EST