No! (was: Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?)

From: Michael Riepe (michael@stud.uni-hannover.de)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 13:16:48 EST

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Previous message: Timur Tabi: "Re: How to allocate PCI bus address space?"
In reply to: Thomas Graichen: "Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: No! (was: Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?)"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: No! (was: Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 09:42:20AM +0000, Thomas Graichen wrote:
[...]
> so it does not need to be remountet at all now ???

Correct -- if you use only SYSV IPC.

-- Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de> "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Previous message: Timur Tabi: "Re: How to allocate PCI bus address space?"
In reply to: Thomas Graichen: "Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: No! (was: Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?)"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: No! (was: Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST