Re: 2.4.0test1-ac4 - mount problem

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 17:26:06 EST


> Yes, MNT_NOT_IF_ROOT makes sense. However, I'ld rather postpone that one
> until the decision on mount(2) interface (or the interface of whatever new
> syscall(s) will be used). I mean, just look at mount(8) syntax:

NOT_IF_ROOT ??? what we care about is remounts not root/no root

> filesystem. The latter is fs-dependent and opaque both for mount(8) and
> sys_mount(). To add more fun, we'll need some syntax for loopbacks and

Some of the MNT flags are not fs dependant - eg MS_RDONLY

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST