Re: Organized Linux QA?

• Next message: Thomas Graichen: "Re: Clustered access to RAID filesystem locking?"
• Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?"
• In reply to: Michael D. Crawford: "Organized Linux QA?"
• Next in thread: Daniel Olsson: "Re: Organized Linux QA?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Michael D. Crawford" wrote:
> At the risk of volunteering for a big task, I'd like to ask if there is
> any kind of organized effort to do QA on Linux, particularly on the
> 2.4.0 release.
[...]
> Would you find this helpful?

More power to you, sir!

I for one welcome as much testing as possible for my drivers. I'm not
sure how others work, but I wait a bit for bug reports to collect, step
back and get a general picture, and then dive in to solve the problem.
Having a bunch of bug reports helps me find the common elements in the
reported problems, narrowing down the solution as much as possible.

        Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik              | Liberty is always dangerous, but
Building 1024            | it is the safest thing we have.
MandrakeSoft, Inc.       |      -- Harry Emerson Fosdick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Thomas Graichen: "Re: Clustered access to RAID filesystem locking?"
• Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?"
• In reply to: Michael D. Crawford: "Organized Linux QA?"
• Next in thread: Daniel Olsson: "Re: Organized Linux QA?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST