James Sutherland wrote:
> The kernel itself would be harder, of course. Kernel modules could do
> something similar - just unload the old one and reload the new one, taking
> care to avoid anything trying to use the module in the mean time - leaving
> just the core code - memory management etc., which would be much more
> difficult.
RTlinux if I am not mistaken takes the stance that the whole linux business
is a low-priority real time process. I don't know how the rtlinux project
has been keeping up with kernel development. But there's a partitioning
system for you, if the RT microkernel (or whatever it is) is running
RT processes and one linux kernel, it could run two.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 nicold@umkc.edu
Visualize creamed corn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST