Andrew Lenharth <adl@cs.washington.edu> said.
> First, old format support works for me. But my real .02$:
> Debian, at least, uses an almost unpatched kernel. All the users and
> developers I've talked to after packaging reiserfs for Debian REALLY want
> to see it in 2.4, since that't the only way it will become a standard part
> of Debian and derived distributions. Most of the people I've talked to
> use reiser regularly, and are iching for the day when install programs ask
> what fs to format a partition with: ext2 or reiserfs. Thus B doesn't
> really work for all "vendors".
What stops you from creating a ReiserFS-patched kernel to be distributed as
a (non-standard) .deb?
> It should be stressed that reiser is the only journalling file system
> ready for inclusion right now. But you all know that.
Strange. I've seen no end of reasons why ReiserFS is _not_ ready for the
kernel right now... you must be reading another l-k than I do.
-- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:27 EST