Re: OOM?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 15:38:42 EST

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on?"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2"
In reply to: David Whysong: "Re: OOM?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: David Whysong: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: OOM?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Alan, this is a workaround but not a good solution. And neither are
> ulimits. The fact that running OOM crashes the kernel is the longest

It doesnt crash the kernel unless init dies

> Isn't anyone interested in fixing it?

Try Rik van Riel's process for death selection stuff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on?"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2"
In reply to: David Whysong: "Re: OOM?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: David Whysong: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: OOM?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:09 EST