Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk...

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 22:42:17 EST

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [patch] forward port of 16 bit nls (vfat, ntfs, ncpfs,"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Next in thread: Michael Westermann: "Design-question erlage the the serial driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> The other concern is that its better for printk to get a message
> out than hang in a lock

This is key point, gentlefolk.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [patch] forward port of 16 bit nls (vfat, ntfs, ncpfs,"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Next in thread: Michael Westermann: "Design-question erlage the the serial driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST