Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> All I want is a faster way to do fsck!
> 40,60,75,100 GB fscking sucks.........I goto lunch for an hour if a 60GB
> drive or larger is being wacked upon.
>
Try 500GB. That's right. Large. Big.
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/rza1 146144 56684 81916 41% /
/dev/rza3 511858304 61405604 424845604 13% /export/data
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/rza1 37760 7029 30731 19% /
/dev/rza3 2000896 303012 1697884 15% /export/data
These crash, and it's a minimum of 3 hours waiting.
Thankfully, there's serial consoles.
And to think we are looking at terabyte systems in the next 60days..
(that's right, 1 terabyte of disk, off of one system. I'm not 100%
positive if Linux can handle a terabyte file system..)
-- ------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Thomas Davis | PDSF Project Leader tadavis@lbl.gov | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST