Re: Signals lost when using asynchronous IO

From: Mikael Vidstedt (mikeee@stacken.kth.se)
Date: Wed Jul 12 2000 - 11:59:59 EST

Next message: Bjorn Wesen: "Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Signals lost when using asynchronous IO"
Next in thread: Shane Nay: "Re: Signals lost when using asynchronous IO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Stephen Tweedie fixed it some time ago. The fix should be in one
> of the 2.2.17pre kernels.

I'm sorry to say that the problem still occurs in the 2.2.17pre11 kernel.
Which fix are you thinking of?

/Mikael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bjorn Wesen: "Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Signals lost when using asynchronous IO"
Next in thread: Shane Nay: "Re: Signals lost when using asynchronous IO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST