Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware

From: Rui Sousa (rsousa@grad.physics.sunysb.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 22:15:30 EST


Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> OK, folks - current bunch of changes looks rather interesting from
> the scalability point of view, but it means changes in 3rd-party code.
> Doing it during the 2.4 is obviously not an option and postponing to
> 2.5 looks like an overkill since changes are massive but very simple.
>
[snipped]

Hi,

The changes you made to some of the sound drivers seem to imply
it's possible to enter release()/mmap() before open() returns, is
this right?

If so what prevents release() from grabbing the BKL first?
Do the drivers now need to check the validity of file->private_data
before using it?

Rui Sousa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST