Re: OOM in 2.2.14

From: David Whysong (dwhysong@physics.ucsb.edu)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 07:42:58 EST


On 13 Jul 2000 jmcmullan@linuxcare.com wrote:

> A root-owned daemon that has made sure to lock down
>any memory it may need via mlock() won't have any swapping
>issues. Running at nice -20, or even better, FIFO scheduling,
>you can eat as much (or as little) of a timeslice from other
>apps as needed.

Yep. Check out the skeleton program on my web page if you're interested in
this. Not fully functional, but it is headed down the right road. (I have
stopped developing it as nobody has expressed any interest in using it,
and I don't need it either.)

> Your thoughts?

Only one: a user-space daemon is great, but the kernel still needs an OOM
killer.

Dave

David Whysong dwhysong@physics.ucsb.edu
Astrophysics graduate student University of California, Santa Barbara
My public PGP keys are on my web page - http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~dwhysong
DSS PGP Key 0x903F5BD6 : FE78 91FE 4508 106F 7C88 1706 B792 6995 903F 5BD6
D-H PGP key 0x5DAB0F91 : BC33 0F36 FCCD E72C 441F 663A 72ED 7FB7 5DAB 0F91

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST