Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 19:07:27 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Comments wanted: Linux/i386 boot protocol doc"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: low-latency patch"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> But 2.7.2.3 doesn't, right? So it's the safe option.

Nod

> Are all uses of strstr() in the kernel non-inlined? What about libc 5
> and libc 6?

If the patches all got merged strstr() in 2.3.x x86 is not inlined. Libc5/6
arent affected they dont use the kernel inline strstr code.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Comments wanted: Linux/i386 boot protocol doc"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: low-latency patch"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST