Re: 2.2. against 2.3 (2.4)

• Next message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH] BTTV, drivers/char/videodev.c, 2.4.0-test4"
• Previous message: AVl: "2.2. against 2.3 (2.4)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

AVl (lists.linux-kernel):
> Which is the main improvements in 2.3(2.4) if compare with 2.2
> (except additional drivers)?. Why bother to switch to 2.4 if now
>all works ok (at least seems to be so)? Any reason?
> I'm not familiar with the sources, so asking..
> Is there a place in the net to read about it ?

http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-05-13-003-04-NW-LF-KN
is long, comprehensive, and possibly even accurate.

-- 
"On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a 'BREAK'
- everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS."
(By Tarl Neustaedter)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH] BTTV, drivers/char/videodev.c, 2.4.0-test4"
• Previous message: AVl: "2.2. against 2.3 (2.4)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST