Re: apm/apcid in 2.4.0-test

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2000 - 06:21:03 EST

Next message: Andrew van der Stock: "Re: F*ck*ng japanese garbage postings and possible HACK."
Previous message: Andrew van der Stock: "Japanese (or other language) postings"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: apm/apcid in 2.4.0-test"
Next in thread: I Lee Hetherington: "Re: apm/apcid in 2.4.0-test"
Reply: I Lee Hetherington: "Re: apm/apcid in 2.4.0-test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
> > If I disable acpi and use apm, kapmd fires up, but uses 94+% of cpu, and
>
> Thats what it should do - thats 94% of the time power saving

Ew. It _used_ to report idle time as idle. That's why I stopped using
2.4.0-test1, because I thought kapmd was caught in a broken loop using
all my value battery.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew van der Stock: "Re: F*ck*ng japanese garbage postings and possible HACK."
Previous message: Andrew van der Stock: "Japanese (or other language) postings"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: apm/apcid in 2.4.0-test"
Next in thread: I Lee Hetherington: "Re: apm/apcid in 2.4.0-test"
Reply: I Lee Hetherington: "Re: apm/apcid in 2.4.0-test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:10 EST