> > > Stephen, you are STIPUD!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> >
> > Ah, yes, quite an argument you have there.
> >
> > > Thanks for the NO-CONFIDENCE vote ..........
> >
> > As I mentioned above, I don't deal w/ this portion of the kernel,
> > unfortunately I don't have time to. Due to this I really have no interest
> > in the standards regarding IDE.
>
>
> Then WHO THE HELL are you to tell me I a wrong!
Well.. Followed the discussion, never responded, but there is a first time
or everything :
- Calling named at each other isn't the way to go. We all make
mistakes. People who believe they don't make any probably work at
Microsoft :-))
- Killing a drive with a ATAPI command sounds bad.. The question is : Do
we need this 'feature' in normal operation ?? No ?? Kill it.
If Andre believes the feature is wrong : Make a patch that kill's it, and
get it in the main stream kernel. Simple. He's the IDE specialist, most of
us are not.
I suggest we kill this thread. I hate flame wars.
> Gommer Pyle?
> Later........
>
> Andre Hedrick
> The Linux ATA/IDE guy
>
Regards,
Igmar Palsenberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:16 EST