Re: IF only........g

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jul 22 2000 - 08:28:11 EST

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: The big IDE fight in a different light"
In reply to: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: IF only........"
Next in thread: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: IF only........"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> STANDBY/SLEEP/STANDBY/SLEEP which would almost definitely overheat the
> drive ...). This disables all raw commands to IDE drives if CAP_RAWIO
> isn't present.

That is the correct intent of CAP_SYS_RAWIO. This IMHO is the right solution.
On a box with no rawio you cannot do /dev/mem or port stuff either

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: The big IDE fight in a different light"
In reply to: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: IF only........"
Next in thread: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: IF only........"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST