Hi!
> Attached below is a patch which translates
> linux-2.4.0-test5/fs/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/net/ipv6/netfilter/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/net/sched/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/net/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/net/wan/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/net/hamradio/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/net/irda/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/block/paride/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/sbus/char/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/sbus/audio/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/ide/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/macintosh/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/usb/serial/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/usb/storage/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/telephony/Makefile
> linux-2.4.0-test5/drivers/ieee1394/Makefile
> to the new makefile style. I hope I didn't break anything. It compiled
> fine for my intel box, but I haven't tested everything.
> Kernel is 2.4.0-test5-pre4.
It looks suspicious:
+obj-$(CONFIG_PMAC_PBOOK) += mediabay.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MAC_FLOPPY) += mediabay.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MAC_SERIAL) += macserial.o
why twice?
+obj-$(CONFIG_MAC_SERIAL) += macserial.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_NVRAM) += nvram.o
why twice?
+obj-$(CONFIG_NVRAM) += nvram.o
Otherwise, it would be very good to merge this to mainstream kernel.
Pavel
-- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:16 EST