Re: vfat broken in test5-pre4?

• Next message: George Anzinger: "Re: asm in C slightly OT"
• Previous message: Marc Lehmann: "Re: ATA-6 Draft Proposal Changes for "vender-unique"."
• In reply to: Matt Yourst: "vfat broken in test5-pre4?"
• Next in thread: Matt Yourst: "Re: vfat broken in test5-pre4?"
• Reply: Matt Yourst: "Re: vfat broken in test5-pre4?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Matt Yourst wrote:

> I think I've found a bug in test5-pre4's vfat support. Here's what I
> did:
>
> 1. Created a new vfat filesystem w/ mkfs.msdos
> 2. cp /dev/null /mnt/testvfat/test.dat
> 3. Here's a directory:
>
> total 16
> drwxrwx--- 2 root root 16384 Jul 24 17:58 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 200 Jul 24 17:57 ../
> -rwxrwx--- 1 root root 0 Jul 24 17:58 testdat

[snip]

> Is anyone able to reproduce this or has an idea what's going on?

Petr Vandrovec does. It looks like a bug was introduced with the 16bit nls
support.

Try the attached patch by Petr and see if it helps. I haven't had time to
test it myself yet (the bug or the patch).

/Urban

• TEXT/PLAIN attachment: vfat.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: George Anzinger: "Re: asm in C slightly OT"
• Previous message: Marc Lehmann: "Re: ATA-6 Draft Proposal Changes for "vender-unique"."
• In reply to: Matt Yourst: "vfat broken in test5-pre4?"
• Next in thread: Matt Yourst: "Re: vfat broken in test5-pre4?"
• Reply: Matt Yourst: "Re: vfat broken in test5-pre4?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:18 EST