"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>:
> Michael Gerdts writes:
>
> > When implementing ACL's please read over section 5.9 of the NFSv4 draft.
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-07.txt
> >
> > By designing ACL's (and other things) to work well with NFSv4 from the
> > start, reiserfs will likely have a leg up on the competition inside and
> > outside of the Linux arena for being able to support NFSv4.
>
> Wow, that is almost pure NT 4.0, with 4 of 7 authors being from Sun!
> The only difference is that the 17 access mask bits are all specific;
> there is no concept of mapping generic bits to object-specific bits.
> The inheritance, types, and scanning algorithm are all from NT.
>
> This is a good system; it can handle Coda and Netware fairly well.
>
> Well, there you go. Windows NT features are required for UNIX now.
> Fortunately it isn't too late for Reiserfs and ext2. JFS seems to
> have a few interesting bits already, due to the OS/2 port. XFS will
> need to be dragged out of the dark ages of withdrawn POSIX drafts.
> UFS has several incompatible ACL flavors already, from Sun, Digital...
ACLs over NFS is much older than that. I've been using them for at least
the last 10 years with Cray UNICOS servers and clients. I even (vaguely)
remember ACLs being available under Trusted SunOS over NFS (both client
and server had to be Trusted SunOS).
It isn't just a property of NT.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil
Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:24 EST