Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs

From: Jesse Pollard (pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil)
Date: Fri Jul 28 2000 - 11:10:15 EST


--------- Received message begins Here ---------

>
> Jesse Pollard wrote:
> > > /lib/modules/2.2.14/build
> >
> > Just an additional thought..
> >
> > How about being able to set the link at boot time too - this is for those
> > sites that have multiple kernels installed (for instance: old reliable,
> > current reliable, and test). Then each kernel could use different modules
> > selected at boot time.
>
> That's what the "2.2.14" is for. Whatever mechanism you use to select
> version-dependent modules at boot time, you use that to find the
> appropriate "build" link too.

Yes, but the definition of the LINK hasn't been specified yet -
something like the command

        (cd /lib/modules; ln -s 2.2.14 boot)

would do, but that defines the link. The path to the appropriate modules
is would be /lib/modules/boot/module_name. It would appear to simplify
the loader a bit by not requiring it to retrieve the uname -r (or uname
-m, or ...) and add flexibility to it as well since the actual link
might be created by:

        (cd /lib/modules; ln -s `uname -m`/`uname -r` boot)

That would allow for variations in the directory structure while maintaining
compatiblility for all module loaders/build procedures that would need it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST