Re: Updated 2.4 status/todo list

• Next message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test5] microcode_release needs no BKL."
• Previous message: Vincent Stemen: "Re: lots of segmentation faults ... why ? (fwd)"
• In reply to: tytso@mit.edu: "Updated 2.4 status/todo list"
• Next in thread: Barry K. Nathan: "Re: Updated 2.4 status/todo list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:31:15AM -0400, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> Security
>
> * Fix module remove race bug (still to be done: TTY, ldisc, I2C,
> video_device, network devices(?) - Al Viro)

OSS code needs to be fixed. I have a 70% patch. Maybe next monday :)

> Compile-time failures
>
> * pdc202xx.c doesn't compile under test5

andre hast posted a patch (no long-time bug :))

> Obvious Projects For People (well if you have the hardware..)
>
> * nNCR5380 isnt smp safe
> * DMFE is not SMP safe
> * Make syncppp use new ppp code
> * Fix SPX socket code
> * Merge the 2.2 ServeRAID driver into 2.4

I'll try to do the ServRAID stuff on monday.

        Christoph

-- 
Always remember that you are unique.  Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test5] microcode_release needs no BKL."
• Previous message: Vincent Stemen: "Re: lots of segmentation faults ... why ? (fwd)"
• In reply to: tytso@mit.edu: "Updated 2.4 status/todo list"
• Next in thread: Barry K. Nathan: "Re: Updated 2.4 status/todo list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:29 EST