We'll find out in a week when we do a national broadcast ... its my head here that we
are talking about
Alan Cox wrote:
> > Frankly I think LFS is ok, but for a high volume site I think I am better of
> > with 2.3.99-pre9 or 2.4.test5. I could use LFS but who will support it ? At
> > least in the dev kernels, there's always linux-kernel mailing list with allot of
>
> On my test set 2.2 + LFS patches is stable. 2.4test3 lasted at best 2 hours
> of pounding, 2.4test5 crashed on boot.
>
> if 2.4test works for you it may well be the fastest option but it may also
> be 'excessively interesting'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:35 EST