Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 20:00:45 EST


wingel@t1.ctrl-c.liu.se wrote:
>
> In article <8m54u3$dh0$1@cesium.transmeta.com> you hpa@zytor.com wrote:
> >Let's get this straight: #include <linux/*> and #include <asm/*> are
> >*expected* to be the kernel headers. This is a completely different
> >issue from the fact that glibc headers shouldn't #include these
> >headers like libc5 did.
>
> And IMHO to be able to do this, one should have to provide an explicit
> -I/usr/src/my-kernel/linux/include, it should not be the default.
>

I disagree. It makes life far too painful for the end user, for really no gain.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:35 EST