Well....'long time' for me was ~ two months. Since CR's last patches, all has
been well. I use shm for apache, gimp, postgres, etc dozens of times a day,
day in and day out.
-d
Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au> writes:
>
> > At 03:55 09/08/00, David Ford wrote:
> > > > * SHM segments not always being detached and destroyed right ?
> > >
> > >Haven't seen this happen in a long time and I use shm a lot.
> >
> > what's your definition of "a long time".
> >
> > some development work that i've been doing against 2.4.0-test3-pre4
> > shows that shm segments are most definitely lost and/or return to free
> > verrrry slowly.
> >
> > (i'll be upgrading to test6-pre7 soon and if its still broken will advise)
>
> Since the shm code was not changed for a long time (long time is since
> Jun 2) please advise now!
>
> I did not have _any_ complaints since my last patch to shm.
>
> Greetings
> Christoph
>
> --
-- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST