Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 16:31:04 EST

Next message: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [FIX] Make deadlock detection work for file locking"
Previous message: Francois romieu: "Re: umsdos still broken in test7"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Next in thread: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Reply: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> same thread group - the original I believe didnt. So long as that is
> done right and your thread group changes on an exec (obviously) then I

Obviously? Descriptor tables remain shared after exec(), ditto for
cwd/root/umask...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [FIX] Make deadlock detection work for file locking"
Previous message: Francois romieu: "Re: umsdos still broken in test7"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Next in thread: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Reply: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:14 EST