On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 09:59:00PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Cool problem:
>
> Some threaded, uh, "thing" sends SIGSTOP to one of its threads.
> The admin sends SIGSTOP to the whole group of tasks, then sends
> SIGCONT to undo the SIGSTOP. Does the thread stopped earlier
> get to continue, or does it somehow remain stopped?
It might be worth it to make SIGSTOP / SIGCONT nest properly anyway. Would
keeping a counter of the level of SIGSTOPs received violate any common
standard / break any applications ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:17 EST