Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 10:13:22 EST

Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system"
Previous message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH] cleanup on selection.c"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> i agree fully. The attached patch against test8-pre1 changes
> schedule_idle() from inline to FASTCALL - things look much nicer with this
> one applied.
>
> Ingo, the local flags stuff on Sparc, remember?

Maybe its time to have FASTCALLFLAGS that is different for sparc ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system"
Previous message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH] cleanup on selection.c"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:23 EST