Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 07:13:24 EST

Next message: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Previous message: Chris Evans: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > And why is nvram access not SYS_RAWIO ?
>
> You cant make the nvram tamper with arbitary memory

But it is clearly hardware access isn't it ?

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Previous message: Chris Evans: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST