Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 08:46:36 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] thread wakeup fix for 2.4.0-test7"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
In reply to: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Next in thread: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Reply: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Reply: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> where you overwrite your old kernel image with a new one without
> rebooting instantly).
>
> But is it so much more expensive than a /proc/config.whatever ?

Use that argument 50 times and your kernel has grown 100K. Unfortunately
everyone keeps using the argument and forgetting the cumulative effect
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] thread wakeup fix for 2.4.0-test7"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
In reply to: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Next in thread: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Reply: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Reply: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST