Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

• Next message: Timur Tabi: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [patch] string-486.h modified"
• In reply to: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Next in thread: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

** Reply to message from Nathan Paul Simons <npsimons@fsmlabs.com> on Thu, 31
Aug 2000 07:24:28 -0600

> i agree with Alan, and for more than just the above reason. One of
> the rules of thumb where i work is "keep that sh*t out of our kernel!". i
> don't see what the problem is with just putting the config file in a common
> place and adding an extension to the end of it, ie
> /boot/config-2.4.0-test1-dbg.

That's why /proc/config.gz should be an option. People who want it, like
myself, can include it. People who don't, like you, can omit.

Why can't we have our cake AND eat it too?

-- 
Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Timur Tabi: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [patch] string-486.h modified"
• In reply to: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Next in thread: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST