Re: [patch] string-486.h modified

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Any good _online_ kernel BSD sockets reference out there??"
• Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: hfs support for blocksize != 512"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] string-486.h modified"
• Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [patch] string-486.h modified"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > This will be a speedup for 486 and older 586. I don't have
> > Intel's optimization manual for 586s handy so i can't argue.
> > But looking at linux/arch/i386/config.in shows that 486
> > strings (CONFIG_X86_USE_STRING_486) are preferred for 486,
> > 586, 586 with TSC and 586 MMX.
>
> Which according to my manual is wrong. Only the 486, IDT winchip, K5 and
> maybe cyrix should use them..

So lets change i386/config.in in test8-pre2.

 
> > Anyway, i would like to hear something about the stability of
> > the new code.
>
> Nod

What is this supposed to mean?

Petkan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Any good _online_ kernel BSD sockets reference out there??"
• Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: hfs support for blocksize != 512"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] string-486.h modified"
• Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [patch] string-486.h modified"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST