"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> writes:
> True, but this can be handled by having the master thread process catch
> SIGSEGV and redistributing the signal to all of its child-threads.
No, it cannot. We have to have a core dump with all threads.
> (The assumption I'm making here is that the master thread doesn't do
> anything except spawn all threads for the process and monitors its child
> processes for death. This is the n+1 model.)
The master thread will not anymore spawn the threads. That's the
whole purpose of this exercise.
-- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST