Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sun Sep 03 2000 - 13:53:43 EST

Next message: Nathaniel Smith: "Hard lock on boot with both 2.2.16 and 2.4.0-pre7"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > > 1) the innd data corruption bug
> >
> > This, I think, was due to a bug in ext2 truncate. If so, it
> > should be fixed in test8-pre2.
>
> Cool...

Unfortunately, not yet.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nathaniel Smith: "Hard lock on boot with both 2.2.16 and 2.4.0-pre7"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST