Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> said:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:00:29PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Shrug. So you want me to make it worse by shipping unproven code in a way
> > > I can't test it ?
> > the code is in 2.4 and has been tested there though. the patches are a
> > backport of the 2.4 code.
> ..so it should be at least as well tested as the USB backport in 2.2.18preX,
> if not more so? Or so is implied. :)
OK, OK, OK. It is by now abundantly clear that NFSv3 is a high-priority
item for lots of people out there. But just complaining about it not being
in the kernel just generates ill will.
Better asK: What can _we_ do to assure Alan that NFS is up to snuff? How
can we help along?
-- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST