Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 15:26:54 EST

Next message: Jeff Epler: "Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee"
Previous message: Benno Senoner: "Ingo's lowlatency-test7-A0 excellent latencies (<1msec), but kernel filesync problems ..."
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2"
Next in thread: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Why do you say it's not been fixed? Can you still reproduce hangs long as
> a write(2) can write? I certainly can't.

I cant reproduce long hangs. Im not seeing as good I/O throughput as before
but right now Im quite happy with the tradeoff. If someone can make it better
then Im happier still

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Epler: "Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee"
Previous message: Benno Senoner: "Ingo's lowlatency-test7-A0 excellent latencies (<1msec), but kernel filesync problems ..."
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2"
Next in thread: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST