>>>>> " " == Albert D Cahalan <acahalan@cs.uml.edu> writes:
> It would not be reasonable to try extending ext2 to 64-bit
> times, but milliseconds might be doable. You'd need 4 bytes to
> support the 3 standard time stamps.
> Going to microseconds would require 8 free bytes, which I don't
> think we have. (but we do have more that one might think, due
> to the unimplemented junk)
Don't forget that 2^20 > 10^6, hence if you really want units of
microseconds, you actually only need to save 3 bytes worth of data per
timestamp.
For the purposes of NFS, however the 'microseconds' field doesn't
actually have to mean anything. It's just used as a cookie.
Furthermore, only the mtime field, and to a limited extent the ctime
field, are used for attribute consistency checking.
If NFS was the only concern therefore, you would get far on just
saving one extra 24-bit field.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST