Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK

From: Matthias Andree (matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de)
Date: Fri Sep 15 2000 - 09:59:22 EST

Next message: Michael Poole: "Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK"
Previous message: Eli Carter: "Re: Fixed addresses for various architectures"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK"
Next in thread: Raul Miller: "Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:

> Every Linux inetd in the world would instantly stop working.

Why should it? inetd.c does not touch fd flags. No F_SETFL, no
O_NONBLOCK, no fcntl. Why should inetd fail with a changed accept(2)
semantics?

-- 
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Poole: "Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK"
Previous message: Eli Carter: "Re: Fixed addresses for various architectures"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK"
Next in thread: Raul Miller: "Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST