Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Sun Sep 24 2000 - 17:13:42 EST

Next message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: how interesting are data->bss patches?"
Previous message: Keith Packard: "Re: [Xpert] Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "[patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Reply: bert hubert: "[patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:43:03PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> any form of serialisation on the quota file). This feels like rather
> a lot of new and interesting deadlocks to be introducing so late in
> 2.4. :-)

Agreed.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: how interesting are data->bss patches?"
Previous message: Keith Packard: "Re: [Xpert] Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "[patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Reply: bert hubert: "[patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:12 EST