Re: the new VMt

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 11:18:17 EST


On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 06:19:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Another thing I would worry about are ports with multiple user page
> > sizes in 2.5. Another ugly case is the x86-64 port which has 4K pages
> > but may likely need a 16K kernel stack due to the 64bit stack bloat.
>
> yep, but these cases are not affected, i think in the order != 0 case we
> should return NULL if a certain number of iterations did not yield any
> free page.

Ok, that would just break fork()

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:15 EST