Hi,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 07:13:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > there is no swap. If there is truly nothing kswapd can do to recover
> > here, then we are truly OOM. Otherwise, kswapd should be able to free
>
> Indeed. But we wont fail the kmalloc with a NULL return
Isn't that the preferred behaviour, though? If we are completely out
of VM on a no-swap machine, we should be killing one of the existing
processes rather than preventing any progress and keeping all of the
old tasks alive but deadlocked.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:16 EST