Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?

From: Daniel Phillips (news-innominate.list.linux.kernel@innominate.de)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:47:46 EST

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: PIDs limited to 15 significant bits"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: (reiserfs hang at boot) where is the kernel debugger?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Local mechanisms simply CANNOT make page replacement work
> well on a system-wide level.

I think you mean 'local mechanisms alone'. The question is not
*whether* the subsystems will work together, but *how*. I have a
nagging feeling we can do a little better than the mechanism currently
on the table.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: PIDs limited to 15 significant bits"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: (reiserfs hang at boot) where is the kernel debugger?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 21:00:09 EST