Hi,
The attached patch seems to fix all the reported deadlock
problems with the new VM. Basically they could be grouped
into 2 categories:
1) __GFP_IO related locking issues
2) something sleeps on a free/clean/inactive page goal
that isn't worked towards
The patch has survived some heavy stresstesting on both
SMP and UP machines. I hope nobody will be able to find
a way to still crash this one ;)
A second change is a more dynamic free memory target
(now freepages.high + inactive_target / 3), this seems
to help a little bit in some loads.
If your mailer messes up the patch, you can grab it from
http://www.surriel.com/patches/2.4.0-t9p7-vmpatch
Linus, if this patch turns out to work fine for the people
testing it, could you please apply it to your tree?
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
--- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:09:18 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c Mon Oct 2 00:19:41 2000
@@ -706,7 +706,9 @@
static void refill_freelist(int size)
{
if (!grow_buffers(size)) {
- try_to_free_pages(GFP_BUFFER);
+ wakeup_bdflush(1);
+ current->policy |= SCHED_YIELD;
+ schedule();
}
}
@@ -859,6 +861,7 @@
int balance_dirty_state(kdev_t dev)
{
unsigned long dirty, tot, hard_dirty_limit, soft_dirty_limit;
+ int shortage;
dirty = size_buffers_type[BUF_DIRTY] >> PAGE_SHIFT;
tot = nr_free_buffer_pages();
@@ -869,21 +872,20 @@
/* First, check for the "real" dirty limit. */
if (dirty > soft_dirty_limit) {
- if (dirty > hard_dirty_limit || inactive_shortage())
+ if (dirty > hard_dirty_limit)
return 1;
return 0;
}
/*
- * Then, make sure the number of inactive pages won't overwhelm
- * page replacement ... this should avoid stalls.
+ * If we are about to get low on free pages and
+ * cleaning the inactive_dirty pages would help
+ * fix this, wake up bdflush.
*/
- if (nr_inactive_dirty_pages >
- nr_free_pages() + nr_inactive_clean_pages()) {
- if (free_shortage() > freepages.min)
- return 1;
+ if (free_shortage() && nr_inactive_dirty_pages > free_shortage() &&
+ nr_inactive_dirty_pages > freepages.high)
return 0;
- }
+
return -1;
}
@@ -2663,9 +2665,8 @@
CHECK_EMERGENCY_SYNC
flushed = flush_dirty_buffers(0);
- if (nr_inactive_dirty_pages > nr_free_pages() +
- nr_inactive_clean_pages())
- flushed += page_launder(GFP_KSWAPD, 0);
+ if (free_shortage())
+ flushed += page_launder(GFP_BUFFER, 0);
/* If wakeup_bdflush will wakeup us
after our bdflush_done wakeup, then
--- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/filemap.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:16:28 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/filemap.c Mon Oct 2 00:11:45 2000
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
atomic_t page_cache_size = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
unsigned int page_hash_bits;
struct page **page_hash_table;
-struct list_head lru_cache;
spinlock_t pagecache_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
/*
--- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/page_alloc.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:16:28 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/page_alloc.c Mon Oct 2 00:31:15 2000
@@ -258,13 +258,13 @@
*/
switch (limit) {
default:
- case 0:
+ case PAGES_MIN:
water_mark = z->pages_min;
break;
- case 1:
+ case PAGES_LOW:
water_mark = z->pages_low;
break;
- case 2:
+ case PAGES_HIGH:
water_mark = z->pages_high;
}
@@ -318,10 +318,19 @@
direct_reclaim = 1;
/*
- * Are we low on inactive pages?
+ * If we are about to get low on free pages and we also have
+ * an inactive page shortage, wake up kswapd.
*/
if (inactive_shortage() > inactive_target / 2 && free_shortage())
wakeup_kswapd(0);
+ /*
+ * If we are about to get low on free pages and cleaning
+ * the inactive_dirty pages would fix the situation,
+ * wake up bdflush.
+ */
+ else if (free_shortage() && nr_inactive_dirty_pages > free_shortage()
+ && nr_inactive_dirty_pages > freepages.high)
+ wakeup_bdflush(0);
try_again:
/*
@@ -378,8 +387,23 @@
*
* We wake up kswapd, in the hope that kswapd will
* resolve this situation before memory gets tight.
+ *
+ * We also yield the CPU, because that:
+ * - gives kswapd a chance to do something
+ * - slows down allocations, in particular the
+ * allocations from the fast allocator that's
+ * causing the problems ...
+ * - ... which minimises the impact the "bad guys"
+ * have on the rest of the system
+ * - if we don't have __GFP_IO set, kswapd may be
+ * able to free some memory we can't free ourselves
*/
wakeup_kswapd(0);
+ if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ current->policy |= SCHED_YIELD;
+ schedule();
+ }
/*
* After waking up kswapd, we try to allocate a page
@@ -440,28 +464,43 @@
* up again. After that we loop back to the start.
*
* We have to do this because something else might eat
- * the memory kswapd frees for us (interrupts, other
- * processes, etc).
+ * the memory kswapd frees for us and we need to be
+ * reliable. Note that we don't loop back for higher
+ * order allocations since it is possible that kswapd
+ * simply cannot free a large enough contiguous area
+ * of memory *ever*.
*/
- if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
- /*
- * Give other processes a chance to run:
- */
- if (current->need_resched) {
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- schedule();
- }
+ if (gfp_mask & (__GFP_WAIT|__GFP_IO) == (__GFP_WAIT|__GFP_IO)) {
+ wakeup_kswapd(1);
+ memory_pressure++;
+ if (!order)
+ goto try_again;
+ /*
+ * If __GFP_IO isn't set, we can't wait on kswapd because
+ * kswapd just might need some IO locks /we/ are holding ...
+ *
+ * SUBTLE: The scheduling point above makes sure that
+ * kswapd does get the chance to free memory we can't
+ * free ourselves...
+ */
+ } else if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
try_to_free_pages(gfp_mask);
memory_pressure++;
- goto try_again;
+ if (!order)
+ goto try_again;
}
+
}
/*
* Final phase: allocate anything we can!
*
- * This is basically reserved for PF_MEMALLOC and
- * GFP_ATOMIC allocations...
+ * Higher order allocations, GFP_ATOMIC allocations and
+ * recursive allocations (PF_MEMALLOC) end up here.
+ *
+ * Only recursive allocations can use the very last pages
+ * in the system, otherwise it would be just too easy to
+ * deadlock the system...
*/
zone = zonelist->zones;
for (;;) {
@@ -472,8 +511,21 @@
if (!z->size)
BUG();
+ /*
+ * SUBTLE: direct_reclaim is only possible if the task
+ * becomes PF_MEMALLOC while looping above. This will
+ * happen when the OOM killer selects this task for
+ * instant execution...
+ */
if (direct_reclaim)
page = reclaim_page(z);
+ if (page)
+ return page;
+
+ /* XXX: is pages_min/4 a good amount to reserve for this? */
+ if (z->free_pages < z->pages_min / 4 &&
+ !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
+ continue;
if (!page)
page = rmqueue(z, order);
if (page)
@@ -481,8 +533,7 @@
}
/* No luck.. */
- if (!order)
- show_free_areas();
+ printk(KERN_ERR "__alloc_pages: %d-order allocation failed.\n", order);
return NULL;
}
@@ -572,6 +623,13 @@
sum = nr_free_pages();
sum += nr_inactive_clean_pages();
sum += nr_inactive_dirty_pages;
+
+ /*
+ * Keep our write behind queue filled, even if
+ * kswapd lags a bit right now.
+ */
+ if (sum < freepages.high + inactive_target)
+ sum = freepages.high + inactive_target;
/*
* We don't want dirty page writebehind to put too
* much pressure on the working set, but we want it
--- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/swap.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:16:28 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/swap.c Sat Sep 30 20:49:27 2000
@@ -100,6 +100,15 @@
page->age = PAGE_AGE_MAX;
}
+/*
+ * We use this (minimal) function in the case where we
+ * know we can't deactivate the page (yet).
+ */
+void age_page_down_ageonly(struct page * page)
+{
+ page->age /= 2;
+}
+
void age_page_down_nolock(struct page * page)
{
/* The actual page aging bit */
@@ -155,30 +164,39 @@
*/
void deactivate_page_nolock(struct page * page)
{
+ /*
+ * One for the cache, one for the extra reference the
+ * caller has and (maybe) one for the buffers.
+ *
+ * This isn't perfect, but works for just about everything.
+ * Besides, as long as we don't move unfreeable pages to the
+ * inactive_clean list it doesn't need to be perfect...
+ */
+ int maxcount = (page->buffers ? 3 : 2);
page->age = 0;
/*
* Don't touch it if it's not on the active list.
* (some pages aren't on any list at all)
*/
- if (PageActive(page) && (page_count(page) <= 2 || page->buffers) &&
+ if (PageActive(page) && page_count(page) <= maxcount &&
!page_ramdisk(page)) {
/*
* We can move the page to the inactive_dirty list
- * if we know there is backing store available.
+ * if we have the strong suspicion that they might
+ * become freeable in the near future.
*
- * We also move pages here that we cannot free yet,
- * but may be able to free later - because most likely
- * we're holding an extra reference on the page which
- * will be dropped right after deactivate_page().
+ * That is, the page has buffer heads attached (that
+ * need to be cleared away) and/or the function calling
+ * us has an extra reference count on the page.
*/
if (page->buffers || page_count(page) == 2) {
del_page_from_active_list(page);
add_page_to_inactive_dirty_list(page);
/*
- * If the page is clean and immediately reusable,
- * we can move it to the inactive_clean list.
+ * Only if we are SURE the page is clean and immediately
+ * reusable, we move it to the inactive_clean list.
*/
} else if (page->mapping && !PageDirty(page) &&
!PageLocked(page)) {
@@ -215,6 +233,10 @@
* not to do anything.
*/
}
+
+ /* Make sure the page gets a fair chance at staying active. */
+ if (page->age < PAGE_AGE_START)
+ page->age = PAGE_AGE_START;
}
void activate_page(struct page * page)
--- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/vmscan.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:16:28 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/mm/vmscan.c Sun Oct 1 19:19:56 2000
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@
goto out_failed;
}
if (!onlist)
- age_page_down(page);
+ /* The page is still mapped, so it can't be freeable... */
+ age_page_down_ageonly(page);
/*
* If the page is in active use by us, or if the page
@@ -419,7 +420,7 @@
continue;
/* Skip tasks which haven't slept long enough yet when idle-swapping. */
if (idle_time && !assign && (!(p->state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) ||
- time_before(p->sleep_time + idle_time * HZ, jiffies)))
+ time_after(p->sleep_time + idle_time * HZ, jiffies)))
continue;
found_task++;
/* Refresh swap_cnt? */
@@ -536,6 +537,7 @@
found_page:
del_page_from_inactive_clean_list(page);
UnlockPage(page);
+ page->age = PAGE_AGE_START;
if (page_count(page) != 1)
printk("VM: reclaim_page, found page with count %d!\n",
page_count(page));
@@ -565,22 +567,24 @@
* This code is heavily inspired by the FreeBSD source code. Thanks
* go out to Matthew Dillon.
*/
-#define MAX_SYNC_LAUNDER (1 << page_cluster)
-#define MAX_LAUNDER (MAX_SYNC_LAUNDER * 4)
+#define MAX_LAUNDER (4 * (1 << page_cluster))
int page_launder(int gfp_mask, int sync)
{
- int synclaunder, launder_loop, maxscan, cleaned_pages, maxlaunder;
+ int launder_loop, maxscan, cleaned_pages, maxlaunder;
+ int can_get_io_locks;
struct list_head * page_lru;
struct page * page;
+ /*
+ * We can only grab the IO locks (eg. for flushing dirty
+ * buffers to disk) if __GFP_IO is set.
+ */
+ can_get_io_locks = gfp_mask & __GFP_IO;
+
launder_loop = 0;
- synclaunder = 0;
maxlaunder = 0;
cleaned_pages = 0;
- if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
- return 0;
-
dirty_page_rescan:
spin_lock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
maxscan = nr_inactive_dirty_pages;
@@ -638,7 +642,7 @@
spin_unlock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
/* Will we do (asynchronous) IO? */
- if (launder_loop && synclaunder-- > 0)
+ if (launder_loop && maxlaunder == 0 && sync)
wait = 2; /* Synchrounous IO */
else if (launder_loop && maxlaunder-- > 0)
wait = 1; /* Async IO */
@@ -725,10 +729,11 @@
* loads, flush out the dirty pages before we have to wait on
* IO.
*/
- if (!launder_loop && free_shortage()) {
+ if (can_get_io_locks && !launder_loop && free_shortage()) {
launder_loop = 1;
- if (sync && !cleaned_pages)
- synclaunder = MAX_SYNC_LAUNDER;
+ /* If we cleaned pages, never do synchronous IO. */
+ if (cleaned_pages)
+ sync = 0;
/* We only do a few "out of order" flushes. */
maxlaunder = MAX_LAUNDER;
/* Kflushd takes care of the rest. */
@@ -774,8 +779,23 @@
age_page_up_nolock(page);
page_active = 1;
} else {
- age_page_down_nolock(page);
- page_active = 0;
+ age_page_down_ageonly(page);
+ /*
+ * Since we don't hold a reference on the page
+ * ourselves, we have to do our test a bit more
+ * strict then deactivate_page(). This is needed
+ * since otherwise the system could hang shuffling
+ * unfreeable pages from the active list to the
+ * inactive_dirty list and back again...
+ *
+ * SUBTLE: we can have buffer pages with count 1.
+ */
+ if (page_count(page) <= (page->buffers ? 2 : 1)) {
+ deactivate_page_nolock(page);
+ page_active = 0;
+ } else {
+ page_active = 1;
+ }
}
/*
* If the page is still on the active list, move it
@@ -805,14 +825,11 @@
pg_data_t *pgdat = pgdat_list;
int sum = 0;
int freeable = nr_free_pages() + nr_inactive_clean_pages();
+ int freetarget = freepages.high + inactive_target / 3;
- /* Are we low on truly free pages? */
- if (nr_free_pages() < freepages.min)
- return freepages.high - nr_free_pages();
-
- /* Are we low on free pages over-all? */
- if (freeable < freepages.high)
- return freepages.high - freeable;
+ /* Are we low on free pages globally? */
+ if (freeable < freetarget)
+ return freetarget - freeable;
/* If not, are we very low on any particular zone? */
do {
@@ -1052,14 +1069,7 @@
/* Do we need to do some synchronous flushing? */
if (waitqueue_active(&kswapd_done))
wait = 1;
- if (!do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, wait)) {
- /*
- * if (out_of_memory()) {
- * try again a few times;
- * oom_kill();
- * }
- */
- }
+ do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, wait);
}
/*
@@ -1096,6 +1106,10 @@
*/
if (!free_shortage() || !inactive_shortage())
interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&kswapd_wait, HZ);
+ /*
+ * TODO: insert out of memory check & oom killer
+ * invocation in an else branch here.
+ */
}
}
--- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/include/linux/swap.h.orig Sat Sep 30 20:42:01 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/include/linux/swap.h Sun Oct 1 15:35:03 2000
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
extern void age_page_up_nolock(struct page *);
extern void age_page_down(struct page *);
extern void age_page_down_nolock(struct page *);
+extern void age_page_down_ageonly(struct page *);
extern void deactivate_page(struct page *);
extern void deactivate_page_nolock(struct page *);
extern void activate_page(struct page *);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 21:00:09 EST