Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?

From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. (jkazos@vt.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 23:28:41 EST

Next message: FORT David: "2.4.0-test9USB related oops"
Previous message: Jerry Kelley: "acquiring resources shared or exclusive"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Maybe reply: Horst von Brand: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Maybe reply: Purtell, Andrew: "RE: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

What does everyone have against gcc 2.95 on this list? I've been compiling kernels successfully (read: not one single (ever) error in compilation) with gcc 2.95.2 for more than a year now. What's the big deal?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: FORT David: "2.4.0-test9USB related oops"
Previous message: Jerry Kelley: "acquiring resources shared or exclusive"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Maybe reply: Horst von Brand: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Maybe reply: Purtell, Andrew: "RE: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST