Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi

From: Torben Mathiasen (torben@kernel.dk)
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:28:58 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Oct 09 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Torben Mathiasen wrote:
> >
> > My point exactly. The ordering of driver in drivers/scsi is done now,
> > but I don't see a clean way of doing I2O without moving upperlayers
> > into a seperate dir.
>
> Why?
>

I was referring to Alan's statement about i2o should be the last lowlevel
driver before the upper layers. I'm not familar with the i2o code,
just thought there was a reason.

-- 
Torben Mathiasen <tmm@kernel.dk>
Linux ThunderLAN maintainer 
http://tlan.kernel.dk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST