Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

From: Philipp Rumpf (prumpf@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk)
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 22:38:02 EST

Next message: Anil kumar: "RAID setup"
Previous message: Daniel Lange: "spurious 8259A interrupt?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If init dies the kernel hangs solid anyway

Init should never die. If we get to do_exit in init we'll panic which is
the right thing to do (reboot on critical systems).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anil kumar: "RAID setup"
Previous message: Daniel Lange: "spurious 8259A interrupt?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST