On 20 Oct 2000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> > invalidate_inode_pages nfs_zap_caches nfs_lock fcntl_setlk
> > do_fcntl sys_fcntl
>
> > So I guess that NFS locking is really bad if the region is
> > mmapped!
>
> Yep, but that's a symptom, not a cause. We want to be able to run
> invalidate_inode_pages() safely at any moment, since the need can be
> triggered externally (because the server and client page caches
> disagree).
Well, the thing is, that if somebody has a page mapped, there's nothing we
can do if the server and client disagrees.
We just cannot invalidate the page - people would actually lose data, and
would lose major local consistency guarantees that UNIX filesystems are
supposed to get.
So it's a matter of one sort of consistency against another - and I think
the local consistency requirements are the stricter ones, considering that
we don't even _know_ whether the server has really changed those pages or
not..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST