Re: 2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: RR"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9"
• In reply to: Markus hennig: "2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!"
• Next in thread: Mohammad Haque: "Re: 2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Markus hennig wrote:

> hi,
>
> kernel 2.4.0test10-pre4
> pentium mmx with 64MB ram
> if anybody interested in more details i will send .config
>
> last log before freeze:
>
> Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!
> invalid operand: 0000
> CPU: 0
>

Hi Markus,

How about trying this patch? (I try to invent a new way of answering the
same FAQ question ;)

Tigran

--- linux/mm/vmscan.c Fri Oct 13 04:34:57 2000
+++ work/mm/vmscan.c Fri Oct 13 08:34:19 2000
@@ -98,10 +98,6 @@
         if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
                 entry.val = page->index;
                 swap_duplicate(entry);
- if (pte_dirty(pte))
- BUG();
- if (pte_write(pte))
- BUG();
                 set_pte(page_table, swp_entry_to_pte(entry));
 drop_pte:
                 UnlockPage(page);

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: RR"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9"
• In reply to: Markus hennig: "2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!"
• Next in thread: Mohammad Haque: "Re: 2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:15 EST